[ad_1]
New York – Re -consideration is suggested, which will begin on Monday for Sarah Palin’s slander case, claiming that the New York Times has released her in editorial office eight years ago.
The only candidate for the Republican Vice President and former governor of Alaska receives another chance to prove to the federal jury that the newspaper slanders it with the editorial office in 2017, which falsely connects the rhetoric of its campaign to the mass shooting. Palin said it damaged her reputation and career.
Times admitted that the editorial office was inaccurate, but said he quickly corrected a “honest mistake”.
The process, which is expected to last a week, comes after the 2nd US Court of Appeal restored the case last year. The choice of jury is scheduled to start on Monday morning.
In February 2022, Judge Jed S. Rakoff in Manhattan rejected Palin’s demands in a decision issued while the jurors discussed. The judge then released the jurors who were sentenced to their sentence, which went against Palin.
In the restoration of the trial, the second round stated that the decision to dismiss Rakoff incorrectly impaired the work of the jurors. He also cites shortcomings in the process, stating that there is a misconception of evidence, an inaccurate instruction of the jury, and the wrong answer to a question from the jurors.
The reproduction is happening as President Donald Trump and others in accordance with his views on news reflection are aggressive to the media when they think there was an unfair attitude.
Trump filed a $ 20 billion case against CBS News for editing an interview with 60 minutes with his opponent in 2024, former Vice President Kamala Harris, and also filed a lawsuit against De Mojn’s Iowa Election Poll register, which turned out to be inaccurate. ABC News has arranged a case with Trump because of his incorrect claim that the president was found civilly responsible for raping writer E. Jean Carroll.
Kenneth G. Turkel, Palin’s lawyer, did not return a request for comment.
Charlie Stadlander, a Times spokesman, said Palin’s claim stems from “passing an event in editorial, which is not for Sarah Palin.”
“This reference was an unintentional mistake and is quickly corrected. We are confident that we will prevail and intend to vigorously protect the case,” Stadtlander said in a statement.
[ad_2]
Source link
