[ad_1]
An LP of the labor that originally intended to be an ally of Kim Leadbeater on the assisted dying legislation claimed that the bill now has poorer precautions than when MPs voted on it in November.
Naz Shah has talked to The independent In the wake of the laborious and sometimes committee stage of the controversial bill completed in parliament last Wednesday.
The Bradford West MP, who served on the committee investigating the bill, claimed that the legislation was “fundamentally defective”.
This comes because data shows that 393 amendments were proposed by MPs that opposed the bill at the second lecture. Of these, 330 was rejected by the committee, 31 withdrew before going to a vote and accepting another 32.
Ms Leadbeater, the sponsor of the bill that a detailed interview to The independent, Wrote to MPs last week and pointed out the changes and number of amendments accepted from both sides of the debate. In her email, she pointed out that 32 amendments were accepted by MPs and that she had her new voluntary assisted dying commission chaired by a judge or retired judge for the “strengthening” of the process.
She noted that a survey taken before the vote in November is dying 79 percent of the public in favor of assisted.
She said: “I hope that we also share our view on the bill itself to ensure that if it does law, it must contain the best protection and precautions, and this amendment helps to achieve it.”
But me. Shah said she is “very disappointed” and “discouraged” with the direction taken after the hope that they can ensure that the precautions are strong.
She revealed: “Kim [Leadbeater] Is a friend and when she first told me about the bill, I was glad to support it and I was even willing to be a sponsor. But the more I looked at the details, the more problems I had. ‘
Below, concerns about the way people suffering from domestic abuse and disabilities may be forced to end their lives early. As someone who previously suffered from domestic abuse in a forced marriage, these issues were important to her.
Ms Shah also made headlines during the process when she was forced to leave a session because her hearing aid batteries were running flat. An attempt to push through amendments extended the session despite the pleas of Ms Shah that she could not participate.
Eventually, she voted against the bill during the second lecture, but went into the committee phase with a view to ‘will to make it work’.
She said, ‘I went into it open -minded. If we get the precautions ready, I would love to support it. ‘
But while MPs are preparing for the unveiling on the final phases on April 25, Ms Shah said she felt “discouraged” about it.
She said: “I feel a little discouraged because I feel like I have done a lot of work on this, because I went in to make this account better, and in fact I came out, and the account is now weaker than when we first entered.”
She particularly emphasizes the amendment of Ms. Leadbeater to remove the protection of a Supreme Court judge or a request to continue assisted death. It has been replaced by an expert panel or voluntary assisted dying commission.
‘It is fundamentally changed, generally like the court, there is no legal supervision. The idea that it has led a judge now is just, it is a story for the birds, because it was not led Judge.
“You have a judge who is going to become a commissioner, and there is no supervision of the commissioner now, because you took the commissioner, you have taken out the supervision with the actual chief medical officers. It actually weakened the bill. ‘
She also supported attempts to harden the bill by ensuring that eating disorders such as anorexia are not given if reasons for assisted die.
“I talked a lot about the anorexia things, and it was weakened. The amendment that [Kim Leadbeater] In the capacity, it weakened the bill and did not strengthen the account.
“Then there is the problem that children are now exposed that doctors can have it [assisted death] Conversation with children. You know, there are fundamental defects in the bill, and I just feel discouraged that I tried to fix it and actually get out, not out of my fault, but, you know, it has weakened. ‘
Opponents of the Bill claimed that 23 of the 32 of their amendments accepted were ‘taking’ measures’ and was not significant, while only seven were significant.
Ms Shah said, “I mean there was no great fundamental.”
[ad_2]
Source link
