[ad_1]
This article contains references to sexual aggression.
Five years after Harvey Weinstein was convicted of rape and taken to the husbands of the film, the former magnate of the film returns to the courts for a new trial that covers the same accusations, plus one that had not been judged before.
The trial occurs a year after a New York Court of Appeals revoked the verdict #Metoo of reference. The court expelled the sentences of Weinstein and the 23 -year prison sentence and ordered a new trial after determining that the original was contaminated by “atrocious” judicial decisions and harmful testimony.
The jury selection begins on Tuesday, with expected opening and testimony statements next week.
Judge Curtis Farber said that, in addition to 12 jurors, six substitutes will be chosen. Prosecutors expect the new trial to last a month.
Weinstein, 73, faces positions involving two women from their original trial in 2020, Jessica Mann and Miriam Haley, and is being tried for the first time for an accusation of a woman who was not in the first case. He declared himself innocent and denies having sexually raped or attacked anyone.
Weinstein is being withdrawn from two positions from his original judgment: a position of criminal sex act for allegedly performing oral sex in a film and television production assistant in 2006 and a third degree violation position for allegedly assaulting an aspiring actor in a hotel room in Manhattan in 2013.
Haley, a former production assistant on the track of the project produced by Weinstein, testified in the 2020 trial that pushed her to a bed in her Manhattan apartment in June 2006 and forced oral sex.
Mann, who said he saw Weinstein as a “Pseudo Padre” figure while following a career as an actor after an approximate education, testified in the 2020 trial that caught her in a hotel room in March 2013, he ordered her to undress as she approached and then raped her. She claims that Weinstein raped her again eight months later at a Beverly Hills hotel, where she worked as a hairdressing.
Weinstein is also accused of a criminal sex office for allegedly forcing oral sex in a different woman in a Manhattan hotel in 2006. That woman, who was not part of Weinstein’s first trial, has not been publicly appointed.
Prosecutors said the woman presented them a few days before the beginning of Weinstein’s first trial, but was not part of that case.
Weinstein’s lawyers argue that prosecutors should not have waited almost five years to present the additional position.
In Decision 4-3 in favor of Weinstein last year, the New York Court of Appeals said that the then James Burke trial had denied Weinstein a totally just trial by letting three women testify about the accusations that were not part of the case and their decision to let the prosecutors confront Weinstein, if he had testified, about his history of bruth behavior.
If you or someone you know is affected by sexual aggression, call 1800 respect to 1800 737 732, text 0458 737 732, or visit . In an emergency, call 000.
For the latest SBS News, and .
[ad_2]
Source link
