Alaskan politicians table resolutions opposing a Canada-U.S. trade war

Article content

A handful of Alaska-level politicians oppose Donald Trump’s “restrictive trade measures that damage Canada-U.S.’s unique relationship” and have been with the recent joint resolution.

Article content

Article content

The same Senate joint resolution sponsored by Senator Cathy Giessel and the 11th proposed by Representative Chuck Kopp and the 11th joint resolution of the House (both Republicans) are to emphasize “one of the most successful international relations in modern international relations” to oppose the real and threatening tariffs of the U.S. president.

Article content

Currently, legislative measures are running through both levels of government to celebrate cooperation and oppose steps that may “negatively impact our integrated economy.”

In Alaska, resolutions passed by the House and Senate will not become law, but are intended to be amended, parry or recognize the importance, whether it is the constitution of the country, landmark or organization.

Proposed bill will prevent Trump from funding military invasion of Canada

In this case, legislators will respect the “mutual benefit” relationship of constraints.

According to Canadian ore, $753 million, from a financial standpoint, close to $600 million in goods will enter Canada each year, 59% of which are ore, slag and ash, mainly data cited at the Alaska Consulate in Alaska.

Trade and investment within Canada support more than 20,000 Alaska jobs, the state is home to nearly forty-two Canadian-owned companies that employ 4,350 residents.

These documents have been three times reminding Trump of negotiations during his first term and ink “the importance of the United States Canada-Mexico Agreement.”

Although he once touted the Canadian-US Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) (known in Canada) as a “good deal”, it is now the main source of his trade relations with his neighbors.

Article content

Article content

In a letter from the sponsor of the Committee No. 9, Gisele “humble” to ask Washington not to follow for Alaska’s sake.

“Although support for a more self-sufficient desire, the reality is; Alaska finds itself without a reliable source of building materials, no reliable source of energy, no reliable source of food, and is completely dependent on countries imported by the state, many of which come from Canada or through Canadian territory or waters, no reliable source of building materials, no reliable source of building materials.”

Gissel said in his resolution to the Republican-controlled Senate that if Alaska calls for an immediate “military defense, it’s Canadian,” an Alaska beacon, which was answering the phone and highlighted a joint interception of Russian and Chinese fighter jets near Alaska last summer.

Speaking to Alaska news sources, she said the state has more coastline than the entire U.S. combination, but no naval bases are needed to defend it.

“We have nothing in the Bering Sea. So, Canada, their Air Force responded. If we need help, their Coast Guard will respond. We are all connected to the Arctic and of course, we are very close to some of the challenging neighbors,” she said.

Article content

Her resolution was first introduced to the Special Committee on Arctic Affairs and was unanimously accepted and sent back to the Rules Committee last week.

In the House of Commons led by the Republican Party, Popular Science’s resolution has been first read and has been forwarded to the Resources Committee.

Craig Weichel, Canada’s Seattle-based Consul General, has been in many U.S. documents, in matching the same key points of the conversation in the letter of support, but also defends Canada’s efforts to strengthen border law enforcement to combat fentanyl.

Copies of both resolutions were sent to Trump and outgoing Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, cabinet minister and members of their respective governments, with multiple senior officers on both sides.

Meanwhile, in British Columbia last week, Prime Minister David Eby said the province would impose taxes on U.S. commercial vehicles heading to Alaska if Trump follows his promised April 2 tariff implementation date.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive spoons, long readings and provocative comments. Please bookmark NationalPost.com here and sign up for our daily newsletter.

Article content