Mark Wootton, on the property of the coast of Hibiscus, which he wants to develop.
Photo: RNZ/LUKA FORMAN
An aquatic care decision to restrict new connections to the wastewater network on the coast of Hibiscus is being labeled as disastrous by the region’s real estate promoters, who say the organization could not do its work.
At the end of last year, Watercare revealed that any developments in the area other than the resources consented until November 15 could not connect to the wastewater network until an update to the Bay Army Waste Treatment Plant was completed, currently scheduled for 2031.
This left many developers in The Lurch, which said the decision will stifle development in an area that needs more houses.
However, Watercare said it had a capacity of 4000 connections on the Hibiscus coast before the army bay treatment plant reached capacity, so that the restriction would not affect housing growth in the area.
He said the decision had to be made to protect the environment and public health and provide sustainable water and wastewater services.
Mark Wootton has a 7000 m² property on the coast of Hibiscus in which he wants to build two new houses.
He had already paid for several geotechnical, landscape and architectural reports on the property, but had no resource consent before finding out in November about restrictions.
“I was chased, absolutely shocked. It’s a government entity that has a legal responsibility to provide waste processing, right? Well, they’re not fulfilling that responsibility, are they?”
Water care map and water and wastewater restrictions in Auckland.
Photo: Aquatic care
Wootton believes that Watercare people need to lose their job for not properly planned.
The decision would suffocate development in the area, he said.
“People who work in this area, they will get other jobs, right? They will diversify,” Wootton said.
“So when we need this construction capacity, when the fucking face care works, there will be no one, because it will have just contracted.”
He believes water care can find a faster solution to the problem – if they are willing to spend the money.
“Okay, it may be more expensive to get an urgent shit update, but it shouldn’t be the end of the world. Yes, it’s more expensive, that’s your fault for making a mistake.”
Hopper Development has three projects in progress on the coast of Hibiscus, which would provide more than 100 houses in total – one of them is planning three years.
Development manager David Barr said the company was completely blinded by Watercare’s decision and now all projects were on the air.
“There was no warning to this. Like everyone, we heard about it in a press release in November 2024, having bought numerous properties. We were shocked.”
There are other options if Tremonha’s development cannot connect its new sections to the wastewater network – such as the construction of wastewater tanks on site or carrying daily at their own costs.
But any alternative would have to be signed by the Code of Practice Care – and Barr said that so far they were unable to talk to the agency about any possible solutions.
The interruption of development in the area for seven years was simply unacceptable, Barr said.
“The amount of housing necessary now, we are already late, so that more delays will be disastrous for our area.”
The repressed demand would be bad news for the prices of houses on the peninsula, he said.
If water care could not provide a better option, the central government needed to intervene, he said.
Local Government Minister Simon Watts said it was a matter of caring for care for developers, but a new aquatic letter that the government implemented last week would provide more scrutiny and supervision to the organization.
Auckland’s head of appeal chief agrees with James Hassall said the board worked with Watercare by granting resources to verify that there was available wastewater capacity, but this could change over time if Earth were developed ahead of expected.
Hassall said that as Auckland grows, the city will experience water and wastewater restrictions in parts of the network and, in the case of the Hibiscus coast, water care planned infrastructure updates to deal with the problem.
Aquatic care responds
Said Watercare Planning and Strategy Director Priyan Perera Verification point He had to make the decision to restrict new connections to protect the environment, public health and provide sustainable wastewater services in the long run.
“So we are trying to find a real balance between our ability to meet growth, but it also protects these main factors for us.”
They were still able to connect 4000 properties to the wastewater network on the coast of Hibiscus before reaching capacity, Perera said.
“Our current tracking of previous years – usually 800 connections made per year, so there are five years of available connections.”
He confirmed Verification point What developers were informed about the restrictions on November 14, a day before the cut.
“There, obviously, there is never a good time to be able to convey this information and have chosen the date, we chose the moment to ensure that we fulfill these goals.”
Several other areas of Auckland, including Wellsford, Warkworth, Waitakere, Otara-Papatoetoe, Beachlands/Maraetai, Favora and Warkworth, also have water and wastewater restrictions according to Watercare’s online map.
Perera said it was possible that these areas could face hibiscus coastal restrictions, but water care were trying to avoid it.
“So now that we provide the maps and have been encouraging people to come to talk to us, there is absolutely an opportunity for them to have a lot of warning in conversations to ensure that they can make appropriate investment decisions.”
SUBSCRIBE IN NGā Pytopito Kōrero, A daily bulletin curated by our editors and delivers directly to your inbox every day of the week.
