6 times the Trump administration has clashed with opponents over court orders

Almost three months after President Donald Trump’s office, lawyers who challenge his actions in court, claim that his administration has violated the court orders in half a dozen cases, according to court records reviewed by ABC News.

From the unilateral freezing of federal funding to the use of the Law on Alien enemies to deport non -citizens, clashes expressed fears about the separation of the authorities and the potential for a constitutional crisis.

The plaintiffs sue the Trump administration claim that the government has violated or ignored the court orders in at least six different cases, but so far no judge has held a member of the Trump administration through disrespect for the court. At least four times the judges have expressed concerns about compliance with the Trump administration with court orders.

The lawyers from the Ministry of Justice vigorously defended the actions of the Trump administration and claim that federal officers have strictly complied with the legal court orders, while questioning the legality of some orders. Each of the cases continues or is appealed so that the district court orders can be released as the higher courts weigh.

Trump has repeatedly swore to obey the court order, even if a judge is governed against parts of his agenda, although he tried to question the power of some judges.

“Well, I always follow the courts and then I will have to appeal it,” Trump told Rachel Scott on ABC in February, citing cases related to the Elon Musk Government Ministry. In these cases, Trump suggested that the judge’s order to “slow down inertia and this gives crooked people more time to cover up the books. Do you know if a person is wrong and they get caught, other people see it and suddenly becomes more difficult.”

The Trump administration is now confronted with its most profile legal battle as it tries to keep Kilmar Abango Garcia in Salvadoran’s custody, although the Supreme Court ordered its administration to facilitate its release.

Using the Law on Alien enemies to eliminate the estimated members of Tren de Aragua

Last month, the Trump administration removed more than 100 alleged members of the Venezuelan band Tren de Aragua at Salvadoran Prison under the Law on Enemy Enemy, although Federal Judge ordered them to be returned to the United States

US District Judge James Boasberg has issued a directive that two aircraft carrying men to return to Salvador to be returned to the United States on March 15. Although both planes are still in the air during the order, the planes landed in Honduras before flying to Salvador.

The lawyers representing the Venezuelan men claim that the Trump administration had violated the court order, and Judge James Boasberg noted that the government “acted in bad faith” when it raised deportment flights.

The Supreme Court released its order, blocking all future removal under the Enemy Enemy Act, as the plaintiffs did not have a jurisdiction to bring a case to the DC before the Supreme Court’s decision, Judge Boasberg was considering initiating contempt proceedings.

Trump defended the use of the Law on Alien enemies – telling reporters last month that he has the power to remove non -citizens under the law – and many times criticized Judge Boasberg to block the removal.

“[Secretary of State Marco Rubio has] The authority to bring bad people out of our country. And you can’t stop this with a judge sitting behind a bench that has no idea what is happening, who happens as a radical left lunatic, “Trump told Karen Travers on ABC.

Removal of Kilmar abrego Garcia

After the Trump administration admitted that she had deported a native of Salvadoran, who lives in Maryland under a protected legal status due to an “administrative mistake”, a federal judge ordered the government to facilitate his return to the United States.

After the Trump administration appealed the decision, the US Supreme Court concluded that Judge Paula Sinis “correctly” requires the United States to facilitate the release of Abrego Garcia from Salvadorant’s custody; However, the Supreme Court ordered the judge Sinis to determine what “respect” Trump is due to his behavior of foreign affairs.

Since the Supreme Court’s Ruling, The Trump Administration Has Double Down on Its Allegation That Abrego Garcia is a Mamber of Ms-13-Without Providing Any Evide-and CLAIMED IT DURING A Meeting with Trump in the Oval Office on Monday, Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele Told Reporters That He Lacks the Power To Rrego Garcia to The Us

“The question is ridiculous. How can I smuggle a terrorist in the United States?” said Bouke.

Benjamin Osorio, a lawyer at Abrego Garcia, told ABC News that he believes that the Trump administration has denied the court’s order and that the contempt order may be the only thing that encourages the US government to return its customer from El Salvador.

Prior to meeting with a bouquet, Trump told reporters that he would obey the Supreme Court order to return the abre Garcia.

“If the Supreme Court said you return someone, I would do it. I respect the Supreme Court,” Trump said.

Removing migrants in third countries

During the hearing last week, Federal Judge gave the lawyers two weeks to the Ministry of Justice to provide more information about three recent elimination of non -citizens of El Salvador, which took place two days after he issued a temporary order blocking such deportation to countries other than their place.

Judge Brian Murphy described “the potential violations of the temporary restraining order” as “on” on “on” April 28 to learn more about deportations.

“This is something that applies to me,” Judge Murphy said. “I think this is something we have to deal with.”

The Ministry of Justice’s attorneys agreed to provide more information on the removal and defended the behavior of the administration.

Judge Murphy is considering expanding his court order, which prevents Trump’s administration from removing non -iconic countries other than their place of origin, without allowing the uncitizes to cause concerns about their safety.

Two days after Judge Murphy temporarily blocked the deportations, the Trump administration announced that it had removed 17 alleged members of Tren de Aragua and MS-13 in the famous Salvador prison. According to the plaintiffs, some of the men in these flights had final orders for removal in Venezuela and had never been granted the right to dispute their removal of Salvador.

Unilateral freezing of state financing

In February, US District Judge John McConnell said that a group of general state lawyers presented evidence that the Trump administration “continued to freeze the federal funds incorrectly and refused to resume the discrepancy of the adopted federal funds”, despite “clear and unambiguous” order that prevents them from blocking financing.

He ordered the government to “immediately restore frozen funding”, although later the general lawyers of the state provided evidence that the Trump administration continues to pause FEMA. Many of the funding streams were restored in the months after Judge McConnell’s order.

The lawyers representing the Trump administration claim that restriction of funds is a legitimate way of identifying and restricting the alleged fraud.

Blocking FEMA grant

Two months after Judge McConnell ordered the Trump administration to extinguish the financing of the countries, he determined that the government “hidden” had stopped millions of dollars funding for FEMA in a direct violation of the court order.

Judge McConnell ordered the Trump administration to “immediately” end “its efforts from preventing the payment of federal funds, finding that the government had directly violated its order.

Last month, a coalition of 22 chief lawyers asked Judge McConnell to suspend freezing after presenting evidence that FEMA continued to limit more than 215 federal grants, despite the court order blocking Trump’s unilateral freezing.

DOJ lawyers withdrew to the request, arguing that FEMA “just applied a manual review process” of any grant.

Judge McConnell disagrees by finding that states have submitted “indisputable evidence” that FEMA “essentially [imposed] An unspecified definite pause on payments “in a direct violation of his preliminary order. He said that the process of reviewing a review guide, quoted by the Trump administration,” violates “a preliminary order issued in the case.

Freezing billions of foreign assistance

Federal judge in February determined that the Trump administration incorrectly detained nearly $ 2 billion in foreign assistance, despite the financing order order.

US District Judge Amir H. Ali has blocked the Trump administration from the imposition of a freezing blanket for funding by the US Agency for International Development, but freezing continues for weeks, according to lawyers representing the non -profit foreign assistance organization. The lawyers representing the Trump administration claim that freezing funding is necessary to identify and block potential fraud.

In order, Judge Ali wrote that the Trump administration justified the freezing by progressing “an unbridled opinion of the executive power, which the Supreme Court is constantly rejecting – in the view that it diverge with many statutes.”

After the Trump administration appealed the order, the US Supreme Court rejected the request to block the order, although the judges ordered the lower court to clarify its original order.