[ad_1]
Katherine Massam noted a piece of land on the Ottawa River near the Quebec-Otario border that warned a pipeline under “high pressure”.
Under her feet, the Enbridge Line 9B was running, which transported oil from Alberta to the Montreal refinery.
The proposed energy east pipeline should also pass nearby energy, but the project was abandoned in 2017 after years of delays and opposition from environmentalists such as Massam.
Massam is a mother of two, worried about the possibility of a pipe leak and its impact on local drinking water. She also worried about how another project will make it difficult for Canada to achieve its climate goals.
“Pipe overflow will be a disaster,” she said. Massam lives in Très-Saint-Saint-Rédempteur in Quebec, a small village covered with farmland in the west of Montreal. She said the opposition would quickly mobilize if another pipeline project was proposed.
“I don’t think it’s going to cost too much to wake it up again,” Massam said of the anti-Pirlin movement. While resistance forces like her have helped stall programs in the past, the political winds may be changing.
Tariffs by U.S. President Donald Trump and threats to Canada’s sovereignty have brought new life into discussions about national energy projects, including Quebec.
In the federal election, the national dialogue has been very focused on economy and sovereignty, with some young voters saying they have little attention to issues such as climate.
Changes in Quebec
The Quebec government is now sending new openings to projects like Energy East, which will carry over one million barrels of oil from Alberta and Saskatchewan every day to NB Saint John
Quebec said last month that Prime Minister François Legault, who recently called Alberta Oil a “dirty energy”, would consider the proposal.
Recent polls Although most people still object, it is now recommended that more Quebecs support the idea.
The province said it could lead to a gas pipeline in the Saguenay area north of Quebec City, where it would be liquefied and shipped overseas. The project was scrapped in 2021 due to environmental concerns and strong public opposition.
Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre restored his campaign center to such a project. He wanted to create an “energy corridor” to transfer oil to St. John and build an LNG terminal in Saguenay.
He also promised to repeal Bill C-69 – the Federal Impact Assessment Act, which allows regulators to consider the environmental and social impact of projects.
Liberal leader Mark Carney said he was willing to accept the pipeline. Carney said he hopes Quebec will use Alberta oil instead of U.S. imports this week, but only with the support of the Aboriginal people” and “all provinces, obviously including Quebec.”
“Any development on any ancestral territory must take into account the principle of consulting,” Francis Verreault-Paul, the new director of the Quebec-Labrador conference, said in a statement.
“This decision requires the consulting process to take into account the knowledge of the Aboriginal people affected by these projects,” he said.
Even the NDP hasn’t completely shut down the pipeline, although that party and the Greens are focusing more on the idea of the East-West power grid.
Under Yves-François Blanchet, Québécois opposes the new pipeline becoming the center’s campaign message.
“This has no help to the economy of Quebec,” he explainadding that no actual project was proposed.
Safe supply situation
For now, the pipeline carrying Canadian oil and gas is targeted at the United States – in addition to the transmount pipeline, the pipeline has been running through BC
If oil prices rise and U.S. visits are subject to tariffs, projects like East could become viable again, said Andrew Leach, an economist and professor at the University of Alberta.
“Then I think the pipeline has a chance to come back,” Leach told CBC Front burner.
Sonya Savage, Alberta Energy and Environment Minister and Pipeline Executive, said the projects are in the national interest.
She warned that the supply routes in Enbridge Traveling through the United Stateseasily cut off.
“If that happens, I think it’s devastating for Ontario and Quebec,” said Savage, who supports Poilievre.
“Get safe supply in Canadian refineries, the country that supplies plants in Canada is beneficial to the national interest, which will adopt political leadership.”
The head of the Montreal Chamber of Commerce who supported East East a decade ago also said Quebec and the rest of Canada would benefit from greater energy cooperation.
“We don’t have a national energy strategy, and now we know we need a national energy strategy,” said President Michel Leblanc, although he no longer directly supports the new pipeline.
He said it will depend on its economic and environmental impact on Quebec. “The question is, ‘Well, how do we make sure we take care of the environment, but we are not under the control of Americans and their own policies?’
Environmentalists say “Phantom”
Quebec environmentalists say they wouldn’t let it happen without the fight. More than 100 civil society groups A letter was signed together Given the need to transition to renewable energy, attempts to revert these projects to the political “Haishi Rage Building”.
The International Energy Agency said that to avoid serious climate impacts, the world must work hard between 2050 and 2050, including halting new long-term oil and gas projects.
Amy Janzwood, an assistant professor of energy projects at McGill University, noted that this dramatic political shift has moved away from these concerns.
“I think there is a lot of opportunism in the industry groups and their place in this regard as a saying: ‘If we don’t have climate policy, right?’”
[ad_2]
Source link
