AFL coaches ‘disenfranchised’, warns Essendon boss

[ad_1]

Brad Scott of Essendon has issued a terrible warning about the future of AFL training ranges, insisting that current players do not see it as a viable career.

In a passionate plea, Scott urged AFL to listen to coaches instead of treating their problems as “nonsense.”

Scott, who previously worked as AFL football head, says he has never seen the training fraternity so “deprived of his rights.”

After retiring from playing in 2006, Scott immediately found work as an assistant coach at Collingwood, before spending a decade at higher work in North Melbourne since 2010.

Dual Brisbane Lions’s Premier Leage player feels Essendon for AFL, but believes it is not a common experience.

“In my time in football, I have never seen a group of more frustrated coaches with a wide range of things,” Scott said Wednesday.

“That has nothing to do with the referee, it has nothing to do with relationships with the AFL.

“It is more the way in which coaches are considered within AFL.

“I have never seen a coaching group more deprived of their rights with the way they are treated as a whole.”

The AFL cut the soft limit for football personnel at the beginning of the COVID-19 blocks that forced the 2020 season to be suspended, and finally reduced.

But almost four years after the last of the pandemic locks, the soft cover is not yet close to the levels prior to co-covid.

By 2025-27, the AFL increased the soft cover limit of $ 7,275 million to $ 7,675 million.

“While the game is blooming and the game is in good shape, the AFL has clearly said what its priorities are, and the training and football departments are low in that list of priorities,” Scott said.

You are sure that AFL will not be able to maintain or attract new coaches, if it is not urgently addressed.

“We not only lose them, we will simply win them,” Scott said.

“Talk to the Association of Players (AFL) on roads for players in training, and their comments are solid: players do not want to do it.

“They see what the coaches are doing and do not want to do that.

“They see the benefits in terms of the career in training versus the challenges it causes, and are voting with their feet and choose not to chase it.

“For the first time, I always remember in football, that is happening, and that has been spoken and simply ignored as nonsense by AFL.

“Well, it’s happening. It will continue to happen.”

The Premier League coach of Collingwood, Craig McRAe, agreed with Scott.

“The soft limit has reached its boiling point in terms of our staff,” McRAe said on Wednesday.

“And they are not just coaches, it’s our staff.

“And at this time, there are many strong voices. There are many shouts, going ‘What’s happening?’

“… there is a lot of personnel who work long hours, and they want to be rewarded for that.”

The chief of the AFL, Andrew Dillon, defended the League approach.

“There have been substantial increases in the soft limit in recent years, after Covid, returning to the 2019 levels,” Dillon said in Adelaide on Wednesday.

“Then, ultimately, it is a call for clubs on how they divide the gentle limit between the senior coach, the assistant coaches, the high performance, the lista managers and the operations.

Scott’s plea follows his twin brother, Geelong’s coach, Chris, criticizing AFL on Tuesday for “selecting cherry trees” when they clarify arbitrary decisions.

The coach of the Western Bulldogs, Luke Beveridge, recently accelerated in the AFL for confusion around the approach.

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *