[ad_1]
South Korea’s Constitutional Court will rule on Friday over the prosecution of President Yoon Suk Yeol, either removing him from office or recovering his powers four months after the conservative leader threw the country into an unrest with a bad statement of martial law.
The court was scheduled to give its ruling in a national television session to start a ruling to maintain the prosecution of parliament and remove Yoon from office must require the support of at least six of the eight judges of the court.
If the court ordered Yoon to be removed, South Korea must hold a new presidential election within two months. If the court reverses its prosecution, Yoon will return to presidential duties immediately.
With a view to potential violence after the ruling, police deployed the opinion control measures to their full extent. By Friday morning, they created an airtight maze of portable walls, foldable fences, fiberglass barriers and hundreds of buses and vehicles – some of their wheels were tied with ropes to prevent protesters from moving them – to seal almost every road and alley to the court. Officers guarded the narrow gaps between vehicles and barriers, directed pedestrians through designated channels, checked IDs and instructed them to walk in a straight direction only.
Thousands of Yoon opponents swore together in the streets overnight, waved banners and sat with plastic pillows on the road as they waited for the court’s decision. The military said it intended to increase his own supervision.
Yoon’s statement from the martial law on December 3 lasted only six hours before being forced to lift it after the liberal opposition-controlled legislature quickly managed to vote. Later in December, the meeting charged Yoon, suspended his powers and sent his case to the Constitutional Court. Yoon faces a separate criminal trial for alleged rebellion.
Whatever Friday’s statement, experts predict that it will deepen domestic division. Over the past four months, millions have taken the streets to expose or support Yoon, which deepens the already serious conservative-liberal division of South Korea.
The most controversial issue at the hearing of Yoon was the reason why he sent hundreds of troops and police officers to the National Assembly, election offices and other places after declaring the martial law.
Yoon said he sent soldiers to the meeting to maintain order and that his statement of martial law was a desperate attempt to pay attention to the ‘evil’ of the most important liberal opposition Democratic Party. But senior military and police officers sent to the meeting testified that Yoon ordered them to keep competitive politicians and prevent the meeting from voting to lift his order.
Although the period of martial law ended without violence, the movements of the prosecution accused Yoon that he had violated the Constitution and other laws by suppressing the meeting activities, arresting politicians and undermining peace.
Prime Minister Han Duck-SOO, the acting leader of the country, repeatedly urged the competitor to accept what the decision made by the court.
[ad_2]
Source link
