Rob Campbell writes an essay that could have the right to ‘profits for coalition dummies’.
I’m sure he is referring to this question during the time of the question: https://www.parliment.nz/en/pb/hansard-debates/rhr/document/hanss_20250325_061620000/6-westion-n-6–minter
Luxon’s pathetic answers (they are not answers) clearly show that PPPs in their thinking are sources of financing, which is why they are banks and tastes (he must have a word with Banker John).
In fact, Rob Campbell recently explained:
The question we have is not the availability of investment money. We could do much more than we do to effectively use this domestic financing, much less the ability to lend. The type of proposed agreements will now include substantial loans abroad as funds leverage what equity they can commit. And many of these agreements provide for actions, making it no different from the debt of the payments balance point of view. Neither the equity nor the debt component will be cheaper than government financing directly.
https://Newsroom.co.nz/2025/03/31/a-hort-guide-for-govt-polyticians-living-na-fantasy-world-of-competition/#comment-337296
Rob Campbell writes an essay that could have the right to ‘profits for coalition dummies’.
I’m sure he is referring to this question during the time of the question: https://www.parliment.nz/en/pb/hansard-debates/rhr/document/hanss_20250325_061620000/6-westion-n-6–minter
Luxon’s pathetic answers (they are not answers) clearly show that PPPs in their thinking are sources of financing, which is why they are banks and tastes (he must have a word with Banker John).
In fact, Rob Campbell recently explained:
https://Newsroom.co.nz/2025/03/17/no-frie-lunch-in-overseas-investment-not-even-a-late-or-gible-one/
This national coalition ‘is terrible economy managers, but stands out in populism and rotation.
To respond