[ad_1]
A call to all Australians affected by the restrictions and medical mandates to attend a hearing in the Superior Court of Canberra on April 9 on April 9 has been taken.
Former Senator Rod Culleton is looking for a ruling from the Superior Court under part 5, Section 51 of the powers of the Constitution of Parliament and the legality of the closing states of the closing borders contrary to section 92 of the Constitution that the states “trade, commerce and relations between the states … will be absolutely free”.
When the Commonwealth tried to stop Dulcie Johnson, crossing the state borders to see her fiance for the last time before she went to the war in World War II, she failed, but when Western Australia closed her border to Clive Palmer during the Covid Plandemic, she succeeded, because the Superior Court dictated the WA Emergency Management Law ” complied with the Constitution. ”
“The president of the Court, Susan Kiefel, said today that the court had found that the law complied with the Constitution, and the instructions did not raise a constitutional problem,” the ABC reported at that time. Then, the act of a state of the Parliament that allows the border to be closed against section 92 of the Superior Law, the Constitution, “complies with the Constitution”?
Rod Culleton with a lot of reason wants this problem to be clarified. What kind of precedent establishes whether a power prime minister can simply write an act that challenges the Constitution and leave with it?
The Superior Court of Australia owes the people of Australia to explain, at least, to explain its contradictory decision.
The other case under section 109 (inconsistency of laws) is that of Dr. Beverley (also known as Valerie) that seeks a decision on whether states can force vaccination in the workplace, which is inconsistent with the Federal Labor Law Just 2009 that it does not have such provision. Its summons order is against the health of the East and the state of Victoria.
Dr. Peers presented his writing for the first time with the HCA in July last year, but he was asked to amend him. He relaxed it in December and again in January after multiple amendments.
Section 109 establishes: “When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the second will prevail, and the first, to the extent of inconsistency, will not be valid.”
Both issues will be addressed in the HCA instructions on April 9, and the supporters of the shares urge people to attend and show their support.
“All Australians who were affected by the restrictions that must be out of the front of the Superior Court in Canberra on this day so that the Superior Court can see that people are at their door, demanding our constitution and our constitutional protections confirmed and that governments must adhere to the restriction of the Constitution in them.
For those who cannot reach Canberra, it was suggested to attend the superior court of their state, with banners related to the affairs of Culleton and Dr. Peers.
Dr. Peers, a general practitioner, suspended his registration in November 2021 after the Australian Health Practicing Regulation Agency (AHPRA) accused her of providing Covid vaccination exemptions without clinical reason.
He was later accused of seven crimes in April 2023 after allegedly continuing to practice medicine from an North High clinic between November 2021 and May 2022.
Dr. Peers has taken these matters to the Court of Appeals and also planned to fight for the freedom of expression of doctors in the Supreme Court of Victoria, because doctors are prevented by the Medical Board of Australia of Freedom of Expression. “Therefore, this application has the potential to relieve doctors and patients of Australia in general.” Dr.’s colleagues can be supported by Givendgo.
[ad_2]
Source link
