[ad_1]
A federal judge on Thursday afternoon said it was unlikely to restore eight former general inspectors fired by the Trump administration in January, even if it was found that the president was breaking the federal law when he removed them from their work without notifying the congress.
“I do not see how I can restore the IG, even if we find that the statute is constitutional,” said Judge Anna Rayes during a hearing in Washington, the Federal District Court of the Colombia District in a case brought by the general inspectors, disputing their termination. “I think what we would deal with may be either a pay or something.”
When Judge Rayes is pressured by a lawyer for the Ministry of Justice as to whether Trump complies with the law, when he was unable to notify the congress of the dismissal, the lawyer agreed that the president did not comply with the text of the Statute related to the termination of the general inspectors.
“There is no real dispute that just breaks the law, right, government?” Judge Reyes asked.
President Donald Trump has made comments on car rates and other topics in the White House Oval Cabinet in Washington, March 26, 2025.
Francis Chung/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock
“What I would say is that we do not dispute that the president did not comply with the sentence in the Statute, calling for a congress notice,” said DOJ lawyer Jeremy Newman, who instead claims that the law does not require congress notice.
When Newman tries to claim that notification of Congress is not a requirement to dismiss the guards, Judge Reyes stepped back.
“As I recently reminded me, English is my second language, but I think I know where a period ends a sentence,” Reyes said, before repeating the text of the law and suggested that she did not agree with the interpretation of DOJ about him.
“I think you can all agree that this is not a worthy way to treat anyone,” Reyes told the sudden shooting. “The question is whether it is legal.”
[ad_2]
Source link
